When exchanges embrace and eat one another
Like their corporate counterparts, bourses world over, too, think being big is the only way to remain competitive
Jojo Puthuparampil
As
traditional trading floors are becoming a distant memory, stock exchanges world over are trying to embrace and
eat one another in order to expand reach and operations. The recent
purchase of a 6 percent stake in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) by
Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and private equity fund Actis is a brief act
in a long consolidation drama being staged on the global financial
markets, featuring leading bourses. The move by Morgan Stanley and
others followed purchases of 20 percent in NSE by NYSE Group, Goldman
Sachs, General Atlantic and Softbank Asian Infrastructure Fund (SAIF);
as well as 5 percent in India's Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) by German
Deutsche Boerse for $910 million, and another 5 percent in BSE by the
Singapore Exchange (SGX) for $42.6 million.
Against
the backdrop of similar developments involving exchanges across the
globe—NYSE's acquisition of Euronext, which runs exchanges in Paris,
Amsterdam, Brussels and Lisbon; the Nasdaq Stock Market's pursuit of the
London Stock Exchange (LSE), and attempts by NYSE and Nasdaq to form
partnerships in Asia—these deals signal that the ongoing consolidation
of global capital markets will gain momentum.
Bourses
in India, whose gross domestic product grew 9.2 percent in the three
months through December, second only to China among the world's major
economies, are emerging active participants in the consolidation
process. By picking up a stake in NSE after paying
$115 million in cash, NYSE, the world's biggest exchange, made its
first investment in Asia through the Indian market where the combined
worth of stocks has risen 50 percent over the past two years to $820
billion.
What
is happening in India is only a stray whiff emanating from a storm
brewing elsewhere—almost all the world’s leading exchanges seem to be
affected by the feverish consolidation contagion. LSE recently rejected a
$4.2 billion take-over bid by Nasdaq. This was preceded by an
unsuccessful bid for the London exchange by OMX, the Swedish Stock
Exchange, in 2000. In recent years, LSE also rejected bids by Euronext
by Deutsche Boerse, which runs the Frankfurt exchange, and by Macquarie
Bank of Australia. In addition to the purchase of Euronext for $20
billion in June 2006, NYSE bought Chicago's Archipelago Holdings, a
nine-year-old, all-electronic trading system, for $10 billion, in an
effort to compete with all-electronic operations.
NSE,
based in Mumbai and twice as big as BSE in terms of volume and value of
the trade it carries out, handled a daily average of $2 billion in
2006. The 14-year-old exchange also dominates trading in equity-based
futures contracts and owns stakes in the Indian National Commodity
Derivatives Exchange and the Multi-Commodity Exchange. The transaction
between NSE and the group led by NYSE and Goldman valued the Indian
exchange at $2.3 billion. The deals involving the group led by Morgan
Stanley and Citigroup will take foreign ownership of the NSE to 26
percent, the maximum allowed by Indian law. Morgan Stanley will buy 3 percent, while Citigroup will take 2 percent and Actis 1 percent.
"In
a rapidly integrating world of financial markets, the partnership (with
NYSE) brings together the strengths of institutions from North America,
Europe and Asia. This alliance marks a significant milestone for NSE in
developing a place for itself in the emerging global scenario. The
global financial investors are amongst the most pedigreed institutions
in the world, and will contribute to building value in the NSE," said Ravi
Narain, managing director and chief executive officer of NSE, in a
statement. The investment of NYSE, which has a market capitalization of
more than $15 billion, is strategically important for NSE, he said.
"Indian
exchanges are the best in the world when it comes to capital market
transactions. However, local exchanges can learn from their foreign
counterparts when it comes to derivatives and structured financial
products," said Nilesh Shah, who manages assets worth $9.8 billion at Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company, based in Mumbai.
While
the alliance with Goldman Sachs, which is a leading advisor to many of
the world's major exchanges, will help NSE strategically, the deal with
Softbank Asian Infrastructure Fund, which has over 60 portfolio
companies in the region, will bring SAIF's extensive network of Indian
as well as international relationships in the financial services sector
to the advantage of NSE.
"Exchanges
like NYSE already attract listings from around the world. Consolidation
among exchanges across the globe would lend leading exchanges a
stronger cross-border presence. Alliances among exchanges will also help
investors better manage assets in foreign countries. As consolidation
picks up strength, companies could list their shares in varied markets.
But a listing in a different market would make sense only if it adds
value to the stock in terms of valuation," said Vineet Suchanti, managing director of Mumbai-based consulting firm Keynote Corporate Services.
BSE,
too, is aggressively forging alliances with foreign exchanges. The
exchange has about 4,800 companies listed, a fully automated trading
platform and nearly a billion dollars a day in turnover. Both NSE and
BSE stand smaller in comparison with NYSE
where $70 billion to $100 billion in shares trade each day. Though BSE
is the oldest bourse in India, it trails behind NSE when it comes to
attracting listings. It plans to sell 51 percent of its shares to
partners and strategic investors in roughly 5 percent increments to
enhance its operations and gain a technical edge.
BSE
expects its alliance with Deutsche Boerse to strengthen its
competencies, especially for trading in derivatives. The move in turn
will help Deutsche Boerse to expand into Asia, and establish its
presence in multiple time-zones and regulatory environments. Through the
deal with the Singapore Exchange, BSE expects to capitalize on
Singapore's position as a regional hub for derivatives and international
listings.
"The
Singapore Exchange is already listing a lot of GDRs (global depositary
receipts) of Indian companies. Once the Indian rupee becomes a
convertible currency - which is likely to happen in the near future –
foreign exchanges such as SGX would be able to attract more Indian
listings and increase trade," Suchanti said.
"Foreign
exchanges are investing in India's long-term growth story," said Shah.
"For Indian exchanges, tie-ups with their foreign peers would mean
visibility, technology, and access to new financial products," he said.
Ownership
The
Indian government lifted a ban on foreign ownership of exchanges in
December last year. A single foreign investor can now own no more than 5
percent in any of the 22 stock exchanges in India. However, the total
foreign ownership cap was raised to 49 percent under rules issued by the
Reserve Bank of India. Foreign direct investment is capped at 26 percent, and foreign institutional investment at 23 percent.
Stocks
on the Indian exchanges are some of the most richly valued in Asia,
after the Sensex index of BSE jumped 45 percent in 2006. They are also
volatile. The Asian market correction in the first week of March took
some sheen off Indian stocks. Despite the volatility and fears of
overheating, many argue that India's long-term economic prospects are
too attractive for potential overseas partners to ignore. The efforts by
foreign exchanges to form alliances with Indian peers mean that they
would want to be a part of the growth the Indian market is likely to
witness in the long run.
"Indian
equities are most likely to continue to perform over a longer-term
perspective, possibly much faster than many other emerging markets,"
said Shah.
Consolidation across the world
In
fact, consolidation is becoming easier for stock exchanges now than
ever before—through massive computers, fiber-optic cables, wires and
satellite links. Consolidation also makes sense in many other ways.
Clearing and settlement will continue to be cumbersome as long as
exchanges remain fragmented. A large number of exchanges will also push
up transaction costs. Consolidation makes trading easier for exchanges
and brings in more liquidity. Bigger exchanges enjoy economies of scale
that reduce trading costs, and attract more traders and listing
companies. And as trading volume increases, it is easier for buyers and
sellers to find one another. Added liquidity helps stock prices respond
quickly to changes in supply and demand.
World
over, shares are increasingly held by large institutions, who need
added liquidity to manage huge trades; only large exchanges can offer
this. Institutions are becoming sophisticated and cost conscious.
Consolidation also brings a lot of transparency in transactions, which
smaller bourses cannot offer.
Regulations
Tighter
regulations make it difficult for US exchanges to compete with bourses
in other countries, where regulations are not as stringent as in the US
in attracting fresh corporate listings. For instance, the Sarbanes-Oxley
law enacted in the wake of the Enron scandal makes company officials
legally liable for the accuracy of their firms' financial statements. By
acquiring foreign peers, US exchanges such as NYSE can serve listing
companies that want to avoid harsher regulations in the US.
Like
companies, stock exchanges also want to be 'big' to remain competitive
in an integrated global economy. Those who don't join the race would
just end up laggards. The purchases of stakes in Indian exchanges by
their foreign counterparts reinforce this.
(This report was written a few years ago and the backdrop against which it was written has changed)
No comments:
Post a Comment